Industrial Oven Retrofit or Replacement?
Company / Plant: ____________________ Line/Asset ID: ____________________
Process: ____________________________ Date: ____________________
Current throughput (parts/hr): _______ Shifts/week: _______ Hours/year: _______
1) Snapshot: What you’re solving for
Check all that apply:
-
☐ Reduce energy per part
-
☐ Improve uptime / reduce unplanned downtime
-
☐ Close process capability gaps (uniformity, ramp rate, cure profile, etc.)
-
☐ Improve safety/compliance (NFPA/UL/OSHA, ventilation, guarding, interlocks)
-
☐ Increase capacity / shorten cycle time
-
☐ Improve maintainability (access, parts availability, controls support)
Top 3 pain points (in your words):
2) Quick “red flag” screen (circle Yes/No)
If you answer YES to 2+ items, replacement often becomes the front-runner.
-
Structural integrity compromised (shell/frame/insulation failure)? Yes / No
-
Safety/compliance exposure with no practical retrofit path? Yes / No
-
Core process can’t be met (uniformity, temp range, cleanliness)? Yes / No
-
Controls are obsolete/unserviceable (no spares, unsupported PLC/HMI)? Yes / No
-
Capacity gap is >25% vs required demand and can’t be fixed with airflow/controls? Yes / No
-
Chronic downtime impacting delivery weekly/monthly? Yes / No
Notes: ____________________________________________________________
3) Energy intensity per part (simple calculator)
Fill what you know—estimate if needed.
A. Current energy use
-
Fuel type: ☐ Gas ☐ Electric ☐ Other __________
-
Average energy rate: $/kWh _______ or $/therm _______
-
Avg energy used per hour (from meter/estimate): _______ kWh/hr or _______ therm/hr
-
Parts processed per hour: _______ parts/hr
Energy cost per part (current):
-
Electric: (kWh/hr × $/kWh) ÷ parts/hr = $ ______ /part
-
Gas: (therm/hr × $/therm) ÷ parts/hr = $ ______ /part
B. Projected energy improvement
-
Retrofit estimate: _______% reduction
-
Replacement estimate: _______% reduction
Projected energy cost per part:
-
Retrofit: current $/part × (1 − retrofit %) = $ ______ /part
-
Replace: current $/part × (1 − replace %) = $ ______ /part
4) Maintenance burden & downtime (annual cost)
Unplanned downtime
-
Downtime hours/year: _______
-
Cost of downtime per hour (labor, lost margin, expediting): $ _______
Annual downtime cost: $ _______
Maintenance
-
Maintenance labor hrs/year: _______ × loaded rate $ _______ = $ _______
-
Parts spend/year: $ _______
-
Contractor/service spend/year: $ _______
Annual maintenance cost: $ _______
Total annual “keep-it-running” cost: $ _______
5) Process capability gaps (score 0–3)
Score each item: 0 = OK | 1 = minor | 2 = frequent issue | 3 = cannot meet requirement
|
Capability item
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Temperature uniformity / repeatability
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Heat-up / recovery time
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Airflow distribution / part coverage
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Controls/recipes/data logging
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Ventilation/exhaust performance
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Product quality rejects linked to thermal process
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
Capability gap score (sum): ______ / 18
Rule of thumb:
-
0–5: Retrofit likely viable
-
6–11: Compare hard numbers (retrofit vs replace)
-
12–18: Replacement often justified
6) Safety & compliance exposure (score 0–3)
Score: 0 = compliant | 1 = small updates | 2 = meaningful risk | 3 = major exposure
|
Item
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Notes
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Burn/heat hazards & guarding
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Interlocks/E-stops/safeties
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Ventilation/LEL/combustion safety
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Electrical/code compliance
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
|
Documentation/training gaps
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
__________
|
Safety/compliance score (sum): ______ / 15
7) Retrofit feasibility checklist (Yes/No)
If “No” shows up often, replacement rises.
-
Can airflow/heat delivery be materially improved (fans, ducts, recirc, seals)? Yes / No
-
Can controls be modernized (PLC/HMI, recipes, alarms, data logging)? Yes / No
-
Can insulation/seals/doors be upgraded without major structural work? Yes / No
-
Can safety upgrades be added without redesigning the whole system? Yes / No
-
Are critical parts available/supportable for 5–10 years? Yes / No
8) Decision matrix (weighted score)
Rate each option 1–5 (5 = best). Multiply by weight.
Weights: Energy (20) | Uptime (25) | Capability (20) | Safety (20) | Lead time/Disruption (15)
|
Criteria
|
Weight
|
Retrofit score (1–5)
|
Retrofit weighted
|
Replace score (1–5)
|
Replace weighted
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Energy per part improvement
|
20
|
||||
|
Uptime & maintenance reduction
|
25
|
||||
|
Capability/quality improvement
|
20
|
||||
|
Safety/compliance risk reduction
|
20
|
||||
|
Lead time & disruption
|
15
|
||||
|
TOTAL
|
100
|
____
|
____
|
If Replace total exceeds Retrofit by 10+ points: replacement likely wins.
If within 0–10 points: do the ROI math and consider phased retrofit.
9) ROI snapshot (simple payback)
Retrofit
-
Estimated project cost: $ _______
-
Annual savings (energy + maintenance + downtime + scrap): $ _______
-
Payback (yrs) = cost ÷ annual savings: _______ years
Replacement
-
Estimated project cost (net of resale/avoidance): $ _______
-
Annual savings: $ _______
-
Payback (yrs): _______ years
10) Recommendation (circle one)
Retrofit / Replace / Needs deeper study
Top 3 next steps: